Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
От | Chuck McDevitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2106D8DC89010842BABA5CD03FEA4061B249C99B@EXVMBX018-10.exch018.msoutlookonline.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Perhaps I could use the same test pg_status uses to decide PS_USE_CHANGE_ARGV and PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV? Any obviously, we don't just use ours for platforms with no or broken getopt_long, since we are talking Solaris (which hasa bug in getopt, but getopt_long works fine) > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 11:26 AM > To: Chuck McDevitt > Cc: Zdenek Kotala; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL > > Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt@greenplum.com> writes: > > This is because MAC, BSD and GNU getopt_long permutes the arguments, > and our getopt_long does not. > > AFAIK those all work by scribbling on the original argv[] array, a > behavior that seems pretty risky from a portability standpoint. > Since our port/ module is only going to get used on old platforms with > no or broken getopt_long(), it needs to be pretty conservative about > what it assumes the system environment can handle. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: