Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Chuck McDevitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2106D8DC89010842BABA5CD03FEA4061013686B5E9@EXVMBX018-10.exch018.msoutlookonline.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
A curiosity question regarding torn pages: How does this work on file systems that don't write in-place, but instead alwaysdo copy-on-write? My example would be Sun's ZFS file system (In Solaris & BSD). Because of its "snapshot & rollback" functionality, it neverwrites a page in-place, but instead always copies it to another place on disk. How does this affect the corruptioncaused by a torn write? Can we end up with horrible corruption on this type of filesystem where we wouldn't on normal file systems, where we arewriting to a previously zeroed area on disk? Sorry if this is a stupid question... Hopefully somebody can reassure me that this isn't an issue.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: