Re: Help optimize view
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help optimize view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21054.1187036243@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Help optimize view ("Relyea, Mike" <Mike.Relyea@xerox.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Relyea, Mike" <Mike.Relyea@xerox.com> writes: > I've increased shared_buffers to 128MB, and restarted the server. My > total run time didn't really change. It doesn't look like you can hope for much in terms of improving the plan. The bulk of the time is going into scanning ParameterValues and Measurements, but AFAICS there is no way for the query to pull fewer rows from those tables than it is doing, and the size of the join means that a nestloop indexscan is likely to suck. (You could try forcing one by setting enable_hashjoin and enable_mergejoin to OFF, but I don't have much hope for that.) If you haven't played with work_mem yet, increasing that might make the hash joins go a bit faster --- but it looks like most of the time is going into the raw relation scans, so there's not going to be a lot of win to be had there either. Basically, joining lots of rows like this takes awhile. If you have to have a faster answer, I can only suggest rethinking your table design. Sometimes denormalization of the schema is necessary for performance. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: