Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21041.1485452493@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> There have been complaints that pg_receivexlog's name is not consistent >> with pg_recvlogical, and I seem to recall there were some votes for >> renaming pg_receivexlog to match. We could make it "pg_recvwal" now. > ... I would prefer not to go there. I agree. "pg_recvlogical" was a badly chosen name; let's not double down on the error. What I think might be worth considering is inserting underscores, eg "pg_receive_wal", anywhere that we are running the abbreviation directly against another word. We won't get another chance. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: