Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21029.1226696502@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements (Martin Pihlak <martin.pihlak@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martin Pihlak <martin.pihlak@gmail.com> writes: > ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: >>> But is the idea of extending QueryDesc generally acceptable? Is it OK >>> to make a copy of the query string? >> >> The only thing I'm worried about is that QueryDesc lives longer than >> its queryText. Can I assume it never occurs? > I just finished validating this -- it seems OK. All of the query strings > that make it to CreateQueryDesc are either pstrdup-ed to Portal, in long > lived memory context or just literals. So no need to make extra copies :) I'm trying to figure out what is the status of this patch? I'm not sure if there's any point in applying it, when contrib/pg_stat_statements hasn't been updated to make use of it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: