Re: [HACKERS] Enhanced containment selectivity function

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, reverted, but I saw it using contsel() so I figured we were allowing
> it, but I see contsel() is used by our "box", so ltree was just using
> something that was already there.  Let me see if I can break out the new
> selectivity function into /contrib.

What really needs to happen next is to think about which bits of
selfuncs.c should be exposed --- what's generally useful, and do we
think that it has an API clean/stable enough to expose?  The reason I
kept all that stuff static so far was because it got whacked around
every release or two, and I didn't want to be constrained by worries
about breaking outside modules.  I'd still prefer to minimize the number
of routines exposed, so some thought is needed.

            regards, tom lane