Re: URGENT: Database keeps crashing - suspect damaged RAM
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: URGENT: Database keeps crashing - suspect damaged RAM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20939.1028653147@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | URGENT: Database keeps crashing - suspect damaged RAM ("Markus Wollny" <Markus.Wollny@computec.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Markus Wollny" <Markus.Wollny@computec.de> writes: > So: Is it bad RAM? How can I make sure? What else could it be? Have you tried running memtest86? I've never used that myself but some folks on the list say it works well. > Here's a small excerpt from the logfile: > 2002-08-06 17:36:23 [17296] DEBUG: _mdfd_blind_getseg: couldn't open > /var/lib/pgsql/data/base/base/16596/16671: Cannot allocate memory Is it possible that you are running with inadequate swap space, a small data segment limit (ulimit -d), or something else that would make the kernel refuse to give memory to a backend process? > 2002-08-06 17:40:53 [16530] DEBUG: connection startup failed (fork > failure): Cannot allocate memory > 2002-08-06 17:52:50 [16530] DEBUG: connection startup failed (fork > failure): Cannot allocate memory Still looks like inadequate memory --- but now I'm thinking that it's a system-wide condition, ie, you just plain haven't got enough RAM for the number of processes you're trying to start. > 2002-08-06 17:52:54 [16530] DEBUG: server process (pid 18237) was > terminated by signal 9 Postgres never issues any kill -9 on itself, but I've heard that the Linux kernel may start killing processes when it's desperately low on memory. Other than the signal 9, everything I see in this trace is either a cannot-allocate-memory failure or followup effects from one. How many backends are you trying to start up, anyway? Might you have a runaway client that keeps opening new backend connections? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: