Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20879.1464379984@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into
src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Nikolay Shaplov wrote: >> Story start from the point that I found out that a.m. can not forbid changing >> some of it's reloptions with ALTER INDEX command. > Hmm, this sounds like a bug to me. In BRIN, if you change the > pages_per_range option for an existing index, the current index > continues to work because the value used during the last index build is > stored in the metapage. Only when you reindex after changing the option > the new value takes effect. > I think Bloom should do likewise. AFAICT, Bloom *does* do that. The reloptions are only consulted directly while initializing the metapage. I think Nikolay's complaint is essentially that there should be a way for an AM to forbid ALTER INDEX if it's not going to support on-the-fly changes of a given reloption. That might be a helpful usability improvement, but it's only a usability improvement not a bug fix. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: