Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20859.1175272966@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design
Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com> writes: > What I am suggesting is to use ActiveSnapshot (actually > Florian's idea) to decide whether the transaction that created > index was still running when we started. Isn't it the case that > some snapshot will be "active" when we plan ? I do not think you can assume that the plan won't be used later with some older snapshot. Consider recursive plpgsql functions for a counterexample: the inner occurrence might be the first to arrive at a given line of the function, hence the first to plan it, yet when we return to the outer instance we might revert to an older snapshot. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: