Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2081.1151000717@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: >>> item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code? > I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build, > because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine. > The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we > don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine. > I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32. The part of it that seems not to be a no-op is #ifdef __CYGWIN____hDllInstance_base = hInst; #endif /* __CYGWIN__ */ #ifdef __CYGWIN___impure_ptr = __imp_reent_data; #endif and the whole thing is wrapped in #if CYGWIN_VERSION_DLL_MAJOR < 1001 so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions. Can anyone say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: