Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrey Lepikhov
Тема Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Дата
Msg-id 2080193d-da8d-4132-f48c-8e29be8fcffc@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/5/21 08:03, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:32 PM Andrey Lepikhov
> I think a simple fix for this would be just remove the check whether
> the instr->running flag is set or not in InstrUpdateTupleCount().
> Attached is an updated patch, in which I also updated a comment in
> execnodes.h and docs in fdwhandler.sgml to match the code in
> nodeAppend.c, and fixed typos in comments in nodeAppend.c.
Your patch fixes the problem. But I found two more problems:

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS OFF, SUMMARY OFF, TIMING OFF) 
 
 
SELECT * FROM ( 
 
 
               (SELECT * FROM f1) 
 
 
                              UNION ALL 
 
 
                                     (SELECT * FROM f2) 
 
 
                                                    UNION ALL 
 
 
                                                           (SELECT * 
FROM l3) 
 
                                                                    ) q1 
LIMIT 6709;
                           QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------
  Limit (actual rows=6709 loops=1)
    ->  Append (actual rows=6709 loops=1)
          ->  Async Foreign Scan on f1 (actual rows=1 loops=1)
          ->  Async Foreign Scan on f2 (actual rows=1 loops=1)
          ->  Seq Scan on l3 (actual rows=6708 loops=1)

Here we scan 6710 tuples at low level but appended only 6709. Where did 
we lose one tuple?

2.
SELECT * FROM (
    (SELECT * FROM f1) 
 
 
                UNION ALL
    (SELECT * FROM f2) 
 
 
                UNION ALL
    (SELECT * FROM f3 WHERE a > 0)
) q1 LIMIT 3000;
                           QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------
  Limit (actual rows=3000 loops=1)
    ->  Append (actual rows=3000 loops=1)
          ->  Async Foreign Scan on f1 (actual rows=0 loops=1)
          ->  Async Foreign Scan on f2 (actual rows=0 loops=1)
          ->  Foreign Scan on f3 (actual rows=3000 loops=1)

Here we give preference to the synchronous scan. Why?

-- 
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: walreceiver that is behind doesn't quit, send replies