Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20764.1354667748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote: > So apparently this is something we broke since Nov 18. Don't know what > yet --- any thoughts? Further experimentation shows that reverting commit ffc3172e4e3caee0327a7e4126b5e7a3c8a1c8cf makes it work. So there's something wrong/incomplete about that fix. This is a bit urgent since we now have to consider whether to withdraw 9.2.2 and issue a hasty 9.2.3. Do we have a regression here since 9.2.1, and if so how bad is it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: