Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20760.1362360852@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be
changed via SQL [review]
Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> I would like to see the name of the directory be conf.d instead of >> auto.conf.d though. What's "auto" about it? Using that word just adds >> a source of confusion. The same problem exists with the file name >> itself. I was hoping for conf.d/persistent.conf here, and no use of the >> word "auto" in the code itself. > my $0.03: I agree with Greg that using the directory is a good idea, and > that his naming is an improvement. Neither of those names is consistent with any other PGDATA subdirectory name we use. It should just be config, or perhaps pg_config, though the latter risks confusion with the tool of the same name. FWIW, I do think that having "auto" or some such in the file name(s) would be a good idea, to help warn people off editing them manually. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: