Re: Regression test failure date.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression test failure date. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20737.1059265496@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Regression test failure date. (Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression test failure date.
Re: Regression test failure date. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org> writes: > 2003-02-15 passes 50/50 and 33/33 on second pass (so far) > 2003-02-16 fails 6/50 I looked in the CVS logs while waiting for a compile, and the only patch I see that goes anywhere near the locking or cache code around that time is this one: 2003-02-17 21:13 momjian * src/: backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c,backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c, backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c,include/storage/lock.h,include/storage/proc.h: Rename 'holder'references to 'proclock'for PROCLOCK references, for consistency. which seems like a safe change (I assume it was just a search-and-replace; do you recall, Bruce?) and anyway the time is not quite right. What time of day did your successive pulls correspond to, anyway? (I believe my cvs2cl printout above is showing me EST.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: