Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20715.1401894850@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Another thought is we could make pg_basebackup simply skip any files that >> exceed RELSEG_SIZE, on the principle that you don't really need/want >> enormous log files to get copied anyhow. We'd still need the pax >> extension if the user had configured large RELSEG_SIZE, but having a >> compatible tar could be documented as a requirement of doing that. > I think going all the way to pax is the proper long-term thing to do, at > least if we can confirm it works in the main tar implementations. > For backpatchable that seems more reasonable. It doesn't work today, and we > just need to document that it doesn't, with larger RELSEG_SIZE. And then > fix it properly for the future. Agreed, this would be a reasonable quick fix that we could replace in 9.5 or later. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: