Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20663.1147984591@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Mark Woodward wrote: >> Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for >> short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed >> source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold >> his or her nose and use MySQL. >> > If we had infinite resources this might make sense. We don't, so it > doesn't. There is a real cost to producing a compatibility layer, and > the cost will be those spiffy new features. The real problem is that there's a whole lot of stuff, such as mysql's weak error checking, that I don't think a "compatibility layer" could sanely provide. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: