Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20643.984880669@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: > At 12:31 17/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> This would be a lot simpler and cleaner if _PrintData() simply didn't >> append a zero byte to the buffer contents. Philip, is it actually >> necessary for it to do that? > Strictly, I think the answer is that it is not necessary. The output of the > uncompress may be a string, which could be passed to one of the str* > functions by a downstream call. AFAICT, this is not the case, and the code > should work without it, but it's probably safer in the long run to leave it > there. Considering that the data we are working with is binary, and may contain nulls, any code that insisted on null-termination would probably be ipso facto broken. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: