Re: explain doubt
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: explain doubt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20619.1340633354@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | explain doubt (Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: explain doubt
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> writes: > Now, what is the .35 in the cost of the bitmap index scan nodes? If you're going to get picky about second-order cost components, it's time to start reading the source code: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c;h=480c1b7425ce66a02e2e10711359143ea7ffe59c;hb=HEAD#l218 http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c;h=95e46276f0a8911758f4ec02b993193bf55eee15;hb=HEAD#l6087 The short answer though is that this is probably coming from CPU cost components not disk-access components. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: