Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?
Дата
Msg-id 20606.1137261456@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?  ("Steven Mooij" <steven@mooij.name>)
Ответы Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?  (Steven Mooij <steven@mooij.name>)
Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?  (Steven Mooij <steven@mooij.name>)
Список pgsql-bugs
"Steven Mooij" <steven@mooij.name> writes:
> testsearch=> insert into t_documentword2 (SELECT document_id, t_word2.id,
> frequency from t_documentword, t_word2 where t_documentword.word =
> t_word2.word);
> server closed the connection unexpectedly

There's not enough information here to guess what the problem is.
(But it's not table size; people routinely manipulate tables much
bigger than that in Postgres.)  A stack trace from the core dump
would be really helpful, or even better a self-contained test case
that other people could replicate the failure with.  See the bug
reporting guidelines at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/bug-reporting.html

> I got the same result in version 7.5.15.

There is no version of Postgres named 7.5.anything.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #2000: psql does not prompt for password
Следующее
От: "Lee Thompson"
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #2170: --rpath option is skipping shared libs