Re: WAL and O_DIRECT
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL and O_DIRECT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20588.1431616292@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WAL and O_DIRECT (Ravi Krishna <s.ravikrishna@aim.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL and O_DIRECT
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Ravi Krishna <s.ravikrishna@aim.com> writes: > Why is O_DIRECT not used, despite the documentation mentioning otherwise? You've not shown us all your settings, but this comment in xlog.c might explain it: * Optimize writes by bypassing kernel cache with O_DIRECT when using * O_SYNC/O_FSYNC and O_DSYNC. But only if archiving and streaming are * disabled, otherwise the archive command or walsender process will read * the WAL soon after writing it, which is guaranteed to cause a physical * read if we bypassed the kernel cache. We also skip the * posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) call in XLogFileClose() for the same * reason. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: