Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20550.1267071777@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote: > That doesn't in itself explain a problem with building from the > alpha tarball though. Is it possible there's a clock skew problem > in the tarball's file timestamps? I poked around in the alpha4 tarball and didn't find clock skew. What I found out was that there's some fundamental fuzzy thinking in the new docs build process: * install-html depends on html depends on $(GENERATED_SGML) * $(GENERATED_SGML) is removed by make clean, therefore also by make distclean Ergo, this type of failure is *guaranteed* when trying to build from a distribution tarball. This needs to be rethought. It might be sufficient to not clean $(GENERATED_SGML) except in make maintainer-clean, but I'm not convinced that's a nice solution. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: