Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20470.1536120960@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > Does anybody else have any idea on how can we write a test for > non-default block size or if we already have anything similar? Build with a non-default BLCKSZ and see if the regression tests pass. There's no way that a build with BLCKSZ x can run any tests for BLCKSZ y. Note that you can expect some plan variations from a different BLCKSZ, so there'd be at least a few "failures" in the regression tests, which'd require manual inspection. Otherwise this could be delegated to a buildfarm animal using a nonstandard BLCKSZ. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: