Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes:
> On 2005-06-23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I looked into the r-tree breakage discussed in this thread:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php

> See also http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00328.php
> in which I made most of the same points.

So you did --- I had forgotten.  Good to see that we arrived at the same
conclusions.

> Notice also that contrib/seg and contrib/cube have their own, and
> incompatible, idea of what the semantics of &< and &> should be.

Um.  Not sure what to do about these ... any opinions?
        regards, tom lane