Re: Reword messages using "as" instead of "because"
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reword messages using "as" instead of "because" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2044143.1758253414@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reword messages using "as" instead of "because" (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reword messages using "as" instead of "because"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > We have a similar message for stop retention. I feel it would be good > to mention that as a reason, so users can increase it. I could think > of two alternatives for stop message based on above suggestion: > "Retention is stopped because the apply process has not caught up with > the publisher within the configured max_retention_duration." > "Retention is stopped because the apply process could not catch up > with the publisher within the configured max_retention_duration." > Do you have any preference? I think "has not" is clearer, or maybe you should say "did not catch up with..." Either way, that sounds like a pure statement of fact whereas "could not" has some overtones of assigning blame. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: