Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20429.1290059225@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> i will start the review of this one... but before that sorry for >> suggesting this a bit later but about using UNNEST as part of the >> sintax? > Does for-in-array do what unnset does? Yes, which begs the question of why bother at all. AFAICS this patch simply allows you to replace for x in select unnest(array_value) loop with for x in unnest array_value loop (plus or minus a parenthesis or so). I do not think we need to add a bunch of code and create even more syntactic ambiguity (FOR loops are already on the hairy edge of unparsability) to save people from writing "select". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: