Re: BUG #16657: Index not reflecting update when date to timestamp comparison operation used in index scan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16657: Index not reflecting update when date to timestamp comparison operation used in index scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2038995.1602034274@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16657: Index not reflecting update when date to timestamp comparison operation used in index scan (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > I observed the following odd behaviour when debugging a problem where my > application inserted a wildly large date into a table. On my end, the date > should have been properly boundary checked in the application first, however > when fixing the value with an update, subsequent queries against the table > were returning "SQL Error [22008]: ERROR: date out of range for timestamp". > After some investigation, I think I have narrowed it down to some sort of > inconsistency with the index used in the query. It is behaving as if the old > invalid value is still in the table, which it is not. This is entirely unsurprising so far as the index is concerned. It will retain the old entry until it's removed by VACUUM. (Yes, REINDEX does it too, but that's overkill.) Queries that have occasion to visit that part of the index will need to compare against the dead value, since they don't (yet) know it's dead. The real issue is that date_cmp_timestamp works by promoting the date to timestamp before comparing, and it fails to cope with an out-of-range date. You don't need any index to demonstrate that: # select '2202020-10-05'::date > '2020-10-05'::timestamp; ERROR: date out of range for timestamp That seems fairly silly actually, especially since I observe that somebody has added all the necessary infrastructure for such comparisons to not fail ... it's just not being used by the mainline code path. I'll fix that in a few days if nobody beats me to it. Although it looks like said infrastructure is only about a year old, so unless we want to back-patch it, it'll only be convenient to fix this in v13 and HEAD. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: