Re: More message encoding woes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More message encoding woes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20389.1238435084@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More message encoding woes (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More message encoding woes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Where does it get the default codeset from? Maybe we could constrain >> that to match the database encoding, the way we do for LC_COLLATE/CTYPE? > LC_CTYPE. In 8.3 and up where we constrain that to match the database > encoding, we only have a problem with the C locale. ... and even if we wanted to fiddle with it, that just moves the problem over to finding an LC_CTYPE value that matches the database encoding :-(. Yup, it's a mess. We'd have done this long ago if it were easy. Could we get away with just unconditionally calling bind_textdomain_codeset with *our* canonical spelling of the encoding name? If it works, great, and if it doesn't, you get English. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: