Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20387.1487348495@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I'm guessing if we backpatch something like that, it would cause issues for >>> translations, right? So we should make it head only? >> We've had the argument a number of times. My stand is that many >> translators are active in the older branches, so this update would be >> caught there too; and even if not, an updated English message is better >> than an outdated native-language message. > That makes sense to me, at least, so +1, for my part. Yeah, if the existing message text is actually wrong or misleading, we should back-patch. I'm not sure I would do that if it's just a cosmetic improvement. In this particular case, +1. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: