Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2038.1160156213@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> ... Or we could >> import the rather ad-hoc shell-wildcard-like rules used by psql's \d >> stuff. None of these are especially attractive :-( > 1. regexes, please. One argument that occurs to me for importing the psql code is that it's solved the problem of including a schema name in the pattern. It would be a lot nicer to say "-t schema.table" than to have to say "-t table -n schema". In particular this allows one to dump s1.foo and s2.bar without also getting s1.bar and s2.foo; a problem that is insoluble if we have only independent schema and table filters. I think that ideally one would only use the schema switches if one actually wanted a schema-by-schema dump, not as a wart on the side of the specific-object-selection switches. The psql code does allow you to get at most of the functionality of regexes... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: