Re: Testing of MVCC

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure there are re-implementations of Expect out there that
>> don't use Tcl; would you be happier with, say, a perl-based tool?

> Yes, because we already have a dependency on perl. But don't be 
> surprised if we can't find such a beast, especially one that runs under 
> the weird MSys DTK perl -

[ digs... ]  It looks like what I was remembering is
http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/Test-Expect-0.29/lib/Test/Expect.pm
which seems to leave all the interesting problems (like driving more
than one program-under-test) to the user's own devices.  Sigh.
        regards, tom lane