Re: Question about DB VACUUM
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about DB VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20334.1065498759@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about DB VACUUM ("Chris White (cjwhite)" <cjwhite@cisco.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about DB VACUUM
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
"Chris White \(cjwhite\)" <cjwhite@cisco.com> writes: > Why aren't there any unused tuples? The "unused" number isn't especially interesting, it's just the number of line pointer slots that were once used and aren't at the moment. At 4 bytes apiece, they aren't costing you anything worth noticing. > Why is the pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index table so big (2818 pages)? This looks like a standard "index bloat" problem (see the archives for details). "REINDEX pg_largeobject" would make the bloat go away for awhile. 7.4 should largely solve this problem, but in earlier releases you need to figure on periodic reindexing. > Why has table grown by 4 pages. Probably because there are now 460 live tuples instead of 227. I don't think you've entirely fixed your problem of not removing all unused large objects... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: