Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20327.1322435869@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I've committed it now, and some buildfarm members are failing with lack > of shared memory, semaphores, or disk space. Don't know what to do with > that or why so many are failing like that. We could create a way to > omit the test if it becomes a problem. I believe the issue is that those BF members have kernel settings that only support running one postmaster at a time. The way you've got this set up, it launches a new private postmaster during a make installcheck; which is not only problematic from a resource consumption standpoint, but seems to me to violate the spirit of make installcheck, because what it's testing is not the installed postmaster but a local instance. Can you confine the test to only occur in "make check" mode, not "make installcheck", please? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: