Re: psql backslash consistency
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql backslash consistency |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2032.1117241147@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql backslash consistency (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql backslash consistency
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl> writes: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-) > Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_. But if we were to ask > pgsql-general I have a feeling we would measure more weight on one side. Yeah, but which side ;-) ? I think the pg-general population would have a very much higher fraction of people who have no user-defined functions and therefore would see no value in \df not showing system functions. If we put in a config variable, that at least lowers the stakes for the losing side in the argument about what the default should be. Without that, I think there will be some serious flamewars ahead... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: