Re: WIP: pushing parser hooks through SPI and plancache
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: pushing parser hooks through SPI and plancache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20307.1257365123@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: pushing parser hooks through SPI and plancache (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: pushing parser hooks through SPI and plancache
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> ... For the moment I've worked >> around this by putting the typedef into nodes/params.h itself, but I >> can't say I find that a pleasing solution. Has anyone got a better >> idea? Should we make a parser/something header that just provides that >> typedef? > Hmm ... if you create the new include file, is that going to avoid > having to include params.h in plancache.h? Well, it'd include the new file instead of params.h. > If not, I don't think there's much point in having a new file (other > than the typedef just not fitting in params.h). Yeah, what's bothering me is that it just doesn't fit there --- doesn't seem to satisfy the POLA. But I guess there are plenty of bigger issues than that in our code base. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: