Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20305.1272067203@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in
standby mode croaks)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I would expect that they'll get an error message that makes it clear >> enough what to do ;-). �In any case, changing the name is hardly going >> to fix things so that 8.4 settings will still work, so why are you >> giving that case as an argument for it? > Principle of obvious breakage. And? If we do it by adding the new variable while not renaming archive_mode, then I'd expect an 8.4 configuration to yield an error along the lines of ERROR: invalid combination of configuration parameters HINT: To turn on archive_mode, you must set wal_mode to "archive" or "hot_standby". (precise wording open to debate, but clearly we can do at least this well) whereas if we rename archive_mode, it's unlikely we can do better than ERROR: unrecognized parameter "archive_mode" Do you really think the second one is going to make any user happier than the first? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: