"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes:
>> We also very occasionally step in and make a decision if -hackers (or
>> another group) is deadlocked over an issue. For example, the whole
>> 'change the name' debate.
> I wouldn't really hold that up as a shining example of a core decision. :)
The point of core's action then was to put a stop to an unproductive
flamewar. Which it did. Could we please not restart that?
regards, tom lane