Re: BUG #19352: SQL Error messages do not include schema name along with table or data object name.

Actually, these error reports do include a schema name among other
things -- it's just hidden from view.  For psql it's very easy to make
them visible, just use

  \set VERBOSITY verbose

Then the error message includes more detail:

=# insert into sh.t2 values (1);
ERROR:  23503: insert or update on table "t2" violates foreign key constraint "t2_i_fkey"
DETAIL:  Key (i)=(1) is not present in table "t".
SCHEMA NAME:  sh
TABLE NAME:  t2
CONSTRAINT NAME:  t2_i_fkey
LOCATION:  ri_ReportViolation, ri_triggers.c:2770

Other clients would have their own ways to display that information.

Kirill Reshke wrote:

> I may be foolish but constraints are not schema-qualified, they just
> have names.

You're not foolish, but the schema name is attached to the table.
You're correct that there can be more than one constraint with the same
name in a schema, but there cannot be more than one constraint with the
same name on the _table_, which is itself uniquely identified by the
schema and its name.

So you could argue that we could improve this by schema-qualifying the
table name (not the constraint name) in this message:

  ERROR:  23503: insert or update on table "sh.t2" violates foreign key constraint "t2_i_fkey"

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No me acuerdo, pero no es cierto.  No es cierto, y si fuera cierto,
 no me acuerdo."                 (Augusto Pinochet a una corte de justicia)