Re: vacuum process running for more than 2 days, still in scanning heap phase
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: vacuum process running for more than 2 days, still in scanning heap phase |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202511121819.yuoha4w6sprz@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | vacuum process running for more than 2 days, still in scanning heap phase (Sbob <sbob@quadratum-braccas.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: vacuum process running for more than 2 days, still in scanning heap phase
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On 2025-Nov-12, Sbob wrote: > We have a vacuum process that has been running for 2 days, the table > is 12GB in total size and vacuum_cost_delay is at 0 Is it autovacuum? Because if so, the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay setting would be used instead of this one. Also check the table config (\d+) in case there are autovacuum settings there, which could make vacuum slower on this particular table. What PG version again? > heap_blks_total | 571437 > heap_blks_scanned | 344577 > heap_blks_vacuumed | 0 > index_vacuum_count | 0 > max_dead_tuples | 155388267 > num_dead_tuples | 199013 Yeah, this seems really slow. Maybe have a look at the wait events in pg_stat_activity to see if you can figure out what is holding it back. > We actually tried a pg_terminate_backend on it and it does not die Hmm, maybe there's something going wrong with it. I've seen corrupted btree indexes make a vacuum go into infinite loops because of loops in the index structure. I would take a few backtraces with gdb or such. Maybe if an index is corrupt in that way, it would also explain why it doesn't interrupt. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Cómo ponemos nuestros dedos en la arcilla del otro. Eso es la amistad; jugar al alfarero y ver qué formas se pueden sacar del otro" (C. Halloway en La Feria de las Tinieblas, R. Bradbury)
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: