Re: BRIN autosummarization lacking a snapshot
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BRIN autosummarization lacking a snapshot |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202511041138.hqoddrfnei7w@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BRIN autosummarization lacking a snapshot (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BRIN autosummarization lacking a snapshot
Re: BRIN autosummarization lacking a snapshot |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Nov-04, Michael Paquier wrote: > Spawning an autovacuum worker can feel artistic as we try to make the > tests run fast, but it's not that bad. The trick is to use an > "autovacuum_naptime = 1". Then you could either scan the server logs > for some 'autovacuum: processing database "blah"', or just a polling > query based on pg_stat_all_tables.autovacuum_count. See for example > 006_signal_autovacuum.pl. Ah yes ... and, actually, we already have a file doing a closely related thing, so I added to it. Here's the patch for master. Backbranches are essentially identical, modulo these changes for 13 and 14: -use Test::More tests => 2; +use Test::More tests => 4; I'm glad we got rid of that :-) With my initial try of this test, just counting the number of BRIN tuples, I was _really_ surprised that the index did indeed contain the expected number of tuples, even when the error was being thrown. This turned out to be expected, because the way BRIN summarization works is that we insert a placeholder tuple first, then update it to the correct value, and the error only aborts the second part. That's why I needed to add a WHERE clause to only count non-placeholder tuples. I also added a 'sleep(1)', to avoid looping on the query when we know autovacuum can't possibly have had a chance to run yet. I unleashed CI on branches 15 and master, and will push soon if they both turn green. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La virtud es el justo medio entre dos defectos" (Aristóteles)
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: