Re: Add \pset options for boolean value display
| От | Álvaro Herrera | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add \pset options for boolean value display | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202511031535.xh3bgfmqzkqa@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Add \pset options for boolean value display (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Add \pset options for boolean value display
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On 2025-Oct-21, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Oct-20, David G. Johnston wrote: > > Thank you. Seems good from a quick read. I’m regretting the choice of the > > display_ prefix; is there any technical limitation or other opposition to > > using just true and false? > > > > \pset true ‘true’ > > \pset false ‘false’ > Uhm. I don't know. [...] I'll gladly take a vote. I got zero votes and lots of digression, so I have pushed with your original choice of "display_true" and "display_false". The "true" and "false" variable names sound too generic and I think they're more likely to cause confusion. I think "null" is not a great name either, but it's been there since forever so I'm not going to propose changing it. It's always been the case that for machine-readable output, --no-psqlrc should be used, and a majority of interesting scripts I've seen do that already, so I don't expect lots of breakage. (Also, such a script is easy to fix if anyone runs into trouble.) I have added this to my stock .psqlrc as dogfooding experiment: select :VERSION_NUM >= 190000 as bool_display \gset \if :bool_display \pset display_true YES \pset display_false no \unset bool_display \endif This means I get support for it when connecting to older servers with new psql, and if I use the old psql, things behave normally with no extra noise. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: