Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
От | Álvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202509221524.dalen7wjv4iv@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Sep-22, Tom Lane wrote: > My first thought about scheduling was "best not in the middle of the > 18.0 release cycle". However, I don't know of any actual connection > between gitweb/cgit and the release-making tasks. My second thought > was "the point here is to cut server load, and maybe we need that to > happen before the anticipated traffic spike on Thursday". There > might not be any connection there either, but if there is, agreed > to get it done sooner not later. I think the traffic overloads are mostly caused by LLM scrapers, which as far as I know does not correlate with spikes caused by human behavior or even those caused by mirroring traffic during a new release or such. I would rather wait until next week, just in case something breaks. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL. Most of the surprises are of the "oh wow! That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind. :)" Scott Marlowe, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2008-10/msg00152.php
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: