Re: REPACK and naming
От | Álvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: REPACK and naming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202509182239.7u77v65vw7di@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: REPACK and naming (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: REPACK and naming
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Sep-18, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Uh, if VACUUM FULL and CLUSTER functionality are going to eventually > point to REPACK, REPACK is the wrong name. I obviously don't agree. > While I can see REPACK having a similar function to VACUUM FULL, the > ordering idea of CLUSTER just doesn't fit into "repack". In my opinion, it fits perfectly well. > I am repacking in a specific order? What if I only want the order > changed without repacking? Yes, you can ask the repacking process to write the tuples in a specific order -- that's a perfectly reasonable thing to ask for, and nobody would be confused about what that would do. You want the order changed but not repacking? I don't see why would anybody think that that's something to ask for. > When did I pack that I have to re-pack now? David Johnston said it here best: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYbZ2c7viape0B+TAoa_t8WteNfu+RF8+3i=D1ZQZQFAg@mail.gmail.com you packed when you started adding tuples to the table. Repack takes what you have "packed" and puts it in order again. > Of the names I have seen, I think REBUILD makes the most sense. I > built the table --- I want it rebuilt now, and perhaps with a specific > ordering. I frankly don't like REBUILD one bit. Nobody BUILDs tables either. One thing we do build is indexes, but a table is not an index. (I was not very impressed with David Rowley's idea that we could have REBUILD INDEX as a substitute for REINDEX, if we were inventing these in a green field. Two reasons for that: one is that REINDEX is not only a Postgres-established term, but also an industry-wide established term. The other is that REINDEX also supports REINDEX TABLE, which doesn't literally mean to reindex the table but instead of reindex all the _indexes_ of the table; if we wanted to use REBUILD for that we would have to do something like "REBUILD INDEXES OF TABLE xyz" which, as you see, gets unwieldy. And for what?) I highly doubt that anybody is going to be confused in the slightest about what the REPACK command does, or that they would start to think about when did they PACK anything before. That sort of argument seems entirely artificial, and that is not how people think. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The ability of users to misuse tools is, of course, legendary" (David Steele) https://postgr.es/m/11b38a96-6ded-4668-b772-40f992132797@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: