Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench
От | Yugo Nagata |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20250918162017.8053e659ed65b69f801c7e03@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:37:29 +0900 Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:22 AM Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > That makes sense. How about rewriting this like: > > > > However, if the --continue-on-error option is specified and the error occurs in > > an SQL command, the client does not abort and proceeds to the next > > transaction regardless of the error. These cases are reported as "other failures" > > in the output. Note that if the error occurs in a meta-command, the client will > > still abort even when this option is specified. > > How about phrasing it like this, based on your version? > > ---------------------------- > A client's run is aborted in case of a serious error; for example, the > connection with the database server was lost or the end of script was reached > without completing the last transaction. The client also aborts > if a meta-command fails, or if an SQL command fails for reasons other than > serialization or deadlock errors when --continue-on-error is not specified. > With --continue-on-error, the client does not abort on such SQL errors > and instead proceeds to the next transaction. These cases are reported > as "other failures" in the output. If the error occurs in a meta-command, > however, the client still aborts even when this option is specified. > ---------------------------- I'm fine with that. This version is clearer. Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: