Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20250624.084431.1321911925805719841.ishii@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Do we know which implementations aren't sending keys? > >> Nope, that's totally unclear. It would be very nice knowing which >> database this is, and if it's at all a production system. > > Yeah, I'm very hesitant to spend any effort here without having > a more concrete use-case. One example is Amazon RDS Proxy. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/rds-proxy.html See the section: "Additional limitations for RDS for PostgreSQL" I haven't tried Amazon RDS Proxy myself but I heard about it in a conversation with a Pgpool-II user. He tried to use Pgpool-II with Amazon RDS Proxy and failed. https://github.com/pgpool/pgpool2/issues/111 Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: