Re: CREATE INDEX regression in 17 RC1 or expected behavior?
От | Yugo Nagata |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE INDEX regression in 17 RC1 or expected behavior? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20240926125110.67e52f4f7a388af539367213@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE INDEX regression in 17 RC1 or expected behavior? (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE INDEX regression in 17 RC1 or expected behavior?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:16:06 -0500 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:22:32PM +0930, Tom Dunstan wrote: > > Reporting in case this is unexpected. At the very least if a function used > > in an index must now always find other functions using an explicit path, it > > seems like this should be documented and noted in the release notes. > > The first compatibility entry in the release notes [0] has the following > sentence: > > Functions used by expression indexes and materialized views that need > to reference non-default schemas must specify a search path during > function creation. Also, this is documented as followins in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-createindex.html . While CREATE INDEX is running, the search_path is temporarily changed to pg_catalog, pg_temp. By the way, this is not mentioned in CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW documentation, although we can find in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW doc. So, I sent the doc patch in [1], and create a commitfest entry [2]. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240805160502.d2a4975802a832b1e04afb80%40sraoss.co.jp [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/49/5182/ Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: