Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll()
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20240604.164409.1964339778483522274.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re:[PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll() ("Long Song" <songlong88@126.com>) |
Ответы |
Re:Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll()
Re:Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 28 May 2024 20:15:59 +0800 (CST), "Long Song" <songlong88@126.com> wrote in > > Hi, > Actually, I still wonder why only the error message > of the last failure to close the file was recorded. > For this unusual situation, it is acceptable to > record all failure information without causing > too much logging. > Was it designed that way on purpose? Note that SlruReportIOError() causes a non-local exit. To me, the point of the loop seems to be that we want to close every single file, apart from the failed ones. From that perspective, the patch disrupts that intended behavior by exiting in the middle of the loop. It seems we didn't want to bother collecting errors for every failed file in that part. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: