Re: [Buildfarm:63] Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

Hello,

I'm a hamerkop maintainer.
Sorry I have missed the scm error for so long.

Today I switched scmrepo from git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git 
to github.com/postgres/postgres.git and successfully modernized
the build target code.

with best regards, Haruka Takatsuka


On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:18:23 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > For citext_utf8, I pushed cff4e5a3.  Hamerkop runs infrequently, so
> > here's hoping for 100% green on master by Tuesday or so.
> 
> Meanwhile, back at the ranch, it doesn't seem that changed anything:
> 
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hamerkop&dt=2024-05-16%2011%3A00%3A32
> 
> ... and now that I look more closely, the reason why it didn't
> change anything is that hamerkop is still building 0294df2
> on HEAD.  All its other branches are equally stuck at the
> end of March.  So this is a flat-out-broken animal, and I
> plan to just ignore it until its owner un-sticks it.
> (In particular, I think we shouldn't be in a hurry to push
> the patch discussed downthread.)
> 
> Andrew: maybe the buildfarm server could be made to flag
> animals building exceedingly old commits?  This is the second
> problem of this sort that I've noticed this month, and you
> really have to look closely to realize it's happening.
> 
>             regards, tom lane


_____________________________________________________________________