Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202405131655.zqmzo7idv7ho@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 (Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2024-Apr-18, Tender Wang wrote: > Now we switch to gdb2, breakpoint at RelationCacheInvalidateEntry(). We > continue gdb2, and we will > stop at RelationCacheInvalidateEntry(). And we will see that p relation > cache item will be cleared. > The backtrace will be attached at the end of the this email. Here is where I think the problem occurs -- I mean, surely PlanCacheRelCallback marking the plan as ->is_valid=false should cause the prepared query to be replanned, and at that point the replan would see that the partition is no more. So by the time we get to this: > Entering ExecInitAppend(), because part_prune_info is not null, so we will > enter CreatePartitionPruneState(). > We enter find_inheritance_children_extended() again to get partdesc, but in > gdb1 we have done DetachPartitionFinalize() > and the detach has commited. So we only get one tuple and parts is 1. we have made a new plan, one whose planner partition descriptor has only one partition, so it'd match what ExecInitAppend sees. Evidently there's something I'm missing in how this plancache invalidation works. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: