Re: meson: Specify -Wformat as a common warning flag for extensions
От | Sutou Kouhei |
---|---|
Тема | Re: meson: Specify -Wformat as a common warning flag for extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20240313.085638.207599003452490069.kou@clear-code.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: meson: Specify -Wformat as a common warning flag for extensions ("Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>) |
Ответы |
Re: meson: Specify -Wformat as a common warning flag for extensions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, In <CZOHWDYQJQCQ.23A5RRV1E05N2@neon.tech> "Re: meson: Specify -Wformat as a common warning flag for extensions" on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:05:27 -0600, "Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech> wrote: > Ok, I figured this out. -Wall implies -Wformat=1. We set warning_level > to 1 in the Meson project() call, which implies -Wall, and set -Wall > in CFLAGS for autoconf. That's the reason we don't get issues building > Postgres. A user making use of the pg_config --cflags option, as Sutou > is, *will* run into the aforementioned issues, since we don't > propogate -Wall into pg_config. > > $ gcc $(pg_config --cflags) -E - < /dev/null > /dev/null > cc1: warning: ‘-Wformat-security’ ignored without ‘-Wformat’ > [-Wformat-security] > $ gcc -Wall $(pg_config --cflags) -E - < /dev/null > /dev/null > (nothing printed) Thanks for explaining this. You're right. This is the reason why we don't need this for PostgreSQL itself but we need this for PostgreSQL extensions. Sorry. I should have explained this in the first e-mail... What should we do to proceed this patch? Thanks, -- kou
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: