Re: A failure in t/001_rep_changes.pl
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A failure in t/001_rep_changes.pl |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20240227.150709.1766217736683815840.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A failure in t/001_rep_changes.pl (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:50:21 +0530, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote in > By any chance do you have the log files when this failure occurred, if > so please share it. In my understanding, within a single instance, no two proclists can simultaneously share the same waitlink member of PGPROC. On the other hand, a publisher uses two condition variables for slots and WAL waiting, which work on the same PGPROC member cvWaitLink. I suspect this issue arises from the configuration. However, although it is unlikly related to this specific issue, a similar problem can arise in instances that function both as logical publisher and physical primary. Regardless of this issue, I think we should provide separate waitlink members for condition variables that can possibly be used simultaneously. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: